Statue wars: what should we do with troublesome monuments? [4] Baltimore mayor Catherine Pugh raises this type of consideration when discussing her decision to remove four Confederate statues. The idea is, this is a statue of a civil leader, and they are someone whose virtue or deeds we’re meant to emulate as citizens. CON: Confederate monuments should stay because they connect past racial crimes to current racial inequality. Since then, at least 44 monuments have been removed across the country. Nearly every heavy-crane company in southern Louisiana. statues The principal legacy of Confederate statues Keep reading for all the pros and cons of removing Confederate statues. Should has received threats from opponents. This entry was posted in A New Birth of Freedom and tagged Culture & Society, … Where statues and other items on public property are offensive to some citizens who advocate for their removal, they should be preserved and moved to private property locations." Pros and Cons Historic Statue Removal – Top 3 Pros & Cons. This also led to the removal of a number of statues of former US Presidents, in certain instances at the hands of the authorities: George Washington, Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson and Ulysses S. Grant were all slaveowners, as well as being responsible for the forced eviction of Native Americans from their land. These monuments were actually erected as this historic event was unfolding, not years later. Source: Abdazizar. The problem with statues is that stone or bronze is meant to last forever, but reputations crumble much more easily. Cecil Rhodes is a classic example. Earlier, this year the #RhodesMustFall movement succeeded in getting the statue of the diamond tycoon and imperialist removed from the University of Cape Town. Updated: March 2021.